If you prefer a third party analysis, please read the original wsj article linked above.
the research study with 80,000 participants which is cited in the article.
The research study that wasn’t about babies on a carnivore diet, are associational only and can’t speak on causation, have weak hazard ratios, and is significantly confounded by carbohydrate consumption (so a totally different metabolic context then carnivore babies)? Or is there a interventional study in the article I missed?
If you prefer a third party analysis, please read the original wsj article linked above.
The research study that wasn’t about babies on a carnivore diet, are associational only and can’t speak on causation, have weak hazard ratios, and is significantly confounded by carbohydrate consumption (so a totally different metabolic context then carnivore babies)? Or is there a interventional study in the article I missed?