• mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    Why? It bought them time to prepare further and gave them the possibility to station troops forward in land that they knew was gonna be overrun by nazis and need liberation afterwards anyway. I really don’t understand what’s so bad about it. You dont win wars with “moral points” but with strategy like that.

    • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      17 days ago

      You’re asking why making a pact with the Nazis is a black mark? I would think that’s obvious. Same for Chamberlain and everyone else.

          • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            17 days ago

            They needed to buy time to prepare for war, it wasn’t until the nazi horde was in Stalingrad that they were ready to fight back. The nazis were going to conquer as much as they did regardless. There doesn’t seem to be any detrimental effect on reality to signing the pact.