• machiavellian@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      15 days ago

      If this isn’t a trollpost and your not getting paid for it, then I’m just baffled on how wrong someone can be regarding generic historical facts. Aside from the idea itself, that it is somehow normal and even commendable to assist foreign states against enemies without them requesting it, all the while criticizing the US for similar actions, your opinion ignores the whole Molotov-Ribbentrop secret pact.

      And for argument’s sake, let’s just pretend, that Soviets were of kind heart and mind and truly wanted to help and protect the Polish people from the horrifing Nazis they so clearly detested. Then why did they host a joint parade in Brest-Litovsk after having conquered Poland?? Or better yet, why did they mercilessly execute 20 000 officers in the woods of Katyn? Not to mention the fact that the Warsaw Uprising failed because the Soviets deliberatly waited for all future dissidents to be killed off, before “liberating” it.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        15 days ago

        I didn’t ignore anything, I wrote about it in greater detail here. There was no “secret pact.” As for the parade, it was marked for the withdrawal of the Nazis from where they had overstretched. As for Katyn, the Nazis “discovered” the site, and Goebbels was the one to popularize it, yet the execution method of shooting civilians (children included) from behind into a mass grave was one the Nazis repeated countless times yet the Soviets were never found to “repeat” this method, and further, the ammunition was from Nazi Germany.

    • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Genuinely, what should the Soviet Union have done instead? Let the Nazis take all of Poland?

      Start with not making a pact with Nazis to divide Europe imo. That’s one part that was enabling the Nazi expansion.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        They didn’t, the closest is there being lines neither country should cross. Both the Soviets and Nazis knew war was coming between them and that the treaty would not hold for long, it wasn’t a long-term plan.

        • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          15 days ago

          Having a pact and zones of interest freed up manpower for Nazis to use in other parts of Europe. That’s how it was part in enabling them. Not that USSR would’ve been guilty of that alone or nowhere near the first to enable the Nazis.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            15 days ago

            Sure would’ve been great if the Soviet Union had the industrial power to take Nazi Germany on by itself, or had the trade with the west at the time to help close the gap. No perfect solution was available to the Soviets.

            • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              15 days ago

              I mean we don’t know what would’ve happened but yes everyone was playing time and hoping Nazis would look elsewhere for at least some time.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                15 days ago

                We know that the Soviet Union was industrializing at incredibly high rates, but was still far behind Germany in total industrialization. We know that the west was trading a ton with the Nazis, and were hostile to the Soviets. We know that the Nazis and Soviets hated each other. What should the Soviet Union have done? Declare war before they were ready, and risk everyone allying with Nazi Germany? Let the Nazis take all of Poland?

                • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  15 days ago

                  Prepare for war within their own borders, mobilize. That alone would’ve helped overall anti-Nazi effort. Now they could first divide Poland with the Soviets and then focus on the West and then head East. East and West being mobilized would’ve been a big barrier.

                  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    13
                    ·
                    15 days ago

                    Gotcha, so you would’ve let the Nazis take all of Poland, with all of the consequences of that, such as extending the Holocaust to further ground. The Soviets were doing all they could to prepare, so this just reads as you preferring Poland be sacrificed so the Soviets could have maintained “moral purity.”