• sobchak@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 days ago

    Kind of a nitpick, but the CEO wasn’t a billionaire. It’s also kind of an important distinction, because it’s not necessarily the wealth that’s the main problem, but how the owner class/bourgeoisie obtain their wealth/income. A slumlord worth less than a million is arguably as morally wrong as a Blackstone CEO (one obviously has more wealth/power/impact though). The evidence of owner class solidarity and government capture/corruption is also important. Rashid, being a politician, is likely trying to not alienate is millionaire donors.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 days ago

      He may not have been a Billionaire - YET - but at his age, he certainly saw himself on that track. He was already ordering horrific policies on behalf of increased profit, so he would look good to his bosses and move up the ladder. He was already an active corporate serial killer, murdering people to advance his career and net worth. Eventually, if he sacrificed enough customers on the altar of profit, he would be rewarded with a Billionaireship.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      You are correct here…

      That CEO was an officer of the oligarchy, he was not an oligarch himself.

      The reaction from the oligarchy is to show of force to ensure that officers stays calm and keep fucking us harder