• Scranulum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 days ago

    It would have been top tier if Goldberg had actually done something like this. Wait until everyone’s quieted down from their American exceptionalist emojipasta and just said something like “…clean on OPSEC, huh, Pete?”

    • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Nah, he should have kept his fucking mouth shut and just saved the screen shots till the channel started to die down.

      Literally the biggest intelligence coup of the century so far, wasted as whiskyleaks memes.

      • Scranulum@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I agree 100 percent. But it’s Goldberg. Stopped clocks and all that. I’m glad he at least nutted up and actually published, but it was an absolute golden opportunity he pissed away.

        Never been a huge fan of the guy. But now you’ve got me wondering, I don’t actually remember: did the administration find out about it by him running the article? Did he ever identify himself to them in the chat?

              • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 days ago

                Oh, you have liability, once you suspect you are gaining unauthorized access to classified materials you are obligated to end all contact and report to relevant authorities, ie the defense department or fbi.

                If he wasn’t a journalist he might have some plausible deniability, but he had 0 excuse.

                • mkwt@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  This is true for people who hold security clearances and who have signed NDAs.

                  This is definitely not true for journalists. There is a first amendment right to publish classified stuff if you get your hands on it. See the Pentagon Papers.

                  For normies who don’t have the backing of the New York Times, there’s a bit of a grey area, because the Espionage Act is still on the books, probably unconstitutional, and never really been seriously tested. See Julian Assange, where he ultimately pled guilty to an Espionage Act charge without challenging the law itself.