• Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Brave? Hard no. Vivaldi? Also no.

    Also, where are qutebrowser and Zen?

    qutebrowser and IceCat are real top of the game when it comes to privacy. But then, they break some of the sites functionality, especially IceCat who seems to be going under the “if your site doesn’t work, it’s your site’s problem” motto.

    • Epzillon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Which is honestly fair? Like, i would enjoy a “unsafe site, access anyways?” button, but if privacy settings break a page that literally is the pages fault for not respecting privacy.

      Edit: typo

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Kinda, but I would like to tailor my experience a bit more than “all or nothing”.

        IceCat is directly a GNU project, so it’s highly ideological - which is important and respectable in a way, but then it gets adoption to near-zero because most sites just don’t work out of the box, and to make it work properly means completely removing all safeguards that make IceCat make sense. There’s little in between.

        I’d rather have something like LibreWolf, but without phone-home functionality, or at least a switch to turn it off. Out of all Firefox forks I know, only IceCat respects user privacy in this way - 0 connections on startup, and then only connection to actual site and whatever it requires.

        Opt-in telemetry (ideally - leveled) and manual bug information sending are totally fine, though.