• Phoeniqz@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    what about short-haul flights? Routes such as Berlin-Copenhagen seem to make sense, as in: Not as fast as a plane but faster than a train and possibly cheaper than both (using hydrogen airships). I don’t know much about airships but that is what came to my mind (besides obviously the freight side of things that is being researched).

    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I doubt it would be faster than a train though. The Hindenburg had a maximum speed of 135 km/h, and even if we were generous and assumed that a hypothetical modern airship would go twice that speed, 270 km/h is still not as fast as high speed trains, many of which can run at 400 km/h, with 300-350 km/h being the most common in Europe. There’s also the same issue of takeoff and landing as with planes. While trains can just pull into a station, open its many doors to exchange passengers, and pull right out of the station, all types of aircraft have complex takeoff and landing procedures that take a significant amount of time. On short flights, the takeoff and landing time accounts for a big portion of the total flight time, so it’s an even bigger issue.

      Again, I’m not flat out saying that airships will never see a revival, but these are the problems that need to be overcome for that to happen.