Cool

The paper clearly is about how a specific form of training on a model causes the outcome.

The article is actively disinformation then, it frames it as a user and not a scientific experiment, and it says it was Facebook llama model, but it wasn’t.

It was a further altered model of llama that was further trained to do this

So, as I said, utter garbage journalism.

The actual title should be “Scientific study shows training a model based off user feedback can produce dangerous results”