Last I checked most people supporting Luigi aren’t international leaders in positions of power, nor is he committing war crimes. So the situation of a leader in the UN defending Israel’s war crimes and genocide is a far cry from the people oppressed by UHC and their kind being happy that Luigi took down one of the oppressors.
I’m not looking back on this thread at the moment, but iirc this is the one that made the distinction of her being a person of power. If it’s not, then I guess ignore what I said or consider it in the context that the main issue to me and others is that she is a person who has direct power to enable Israel’s reign of terror over Palestine. Making her complicit in the genocide.
Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t the agreement with war crimes make you a sympathizer? The act of being a sympathizer is deplorable, but not illegal. I feel like a lot of people take their name-calling to the extremes these days.
Please work.on your reading comprehension. That is not at all what I am asking. What I am asking is if that is already making you a war criminal in contrast to simply a bad person. If you don’t see the difference in that, I cannot help you.
Genocide supporting price of shit, you are saying it yourself! You are not calling her a war criminal either, and that’s the point here but you are not grasping that, so that’s it from my end. Have a good life with your attitude.
However, persecution is an international crime against humanity, so if someone wanted to, they could make a case against her at the International Crime Court.
Does it make you a war criminal if you simply agree with war crimes that others have committed?
Bit of a wide reach to call her a war criminal, no matter if you agree or disagree with her position.
IMO I does if you are in a position of power like this.
Does it make you a war criminal if you actively defend the people committing war crimes while helping to send them weapons?
Actively defend them? No it doesn’t.
Sending weapons? At the very least you’re an accessory to it, so I’d agree with that.
What? Actively defending war criminals makes you complicit.
Actively defending a murderer doesn’t make one a murderer
It makes you complicit, as the other person said.
Man there’s thousands of people that murdered Brian Thompson then, huh
Last I checked most people supporting Luigi aren’t international leaders in positions of power, nor is he committing war crimes. So the situation of a leader in the UN defending Israel’s war crimes and genocide is a far cry from the people oppressed by UHC and their kind being happy that Luigi took down one of the oppressors.
I’m not looking back on this thread at the moment, but iirc this is the one that made the distinction of her being a person of power. If it’s not, then I guess ignore what I said or consider it in the context that the main issue to me and others is that she is a person who has direct power to enable Israel’s reign of terror over Palestine. Making her complicit in the genocide.
Jesus, dude. Listen to yourself.
I agree that Hitler should have been assassinated. Therefore, I am as much of a hero as those who tried.
The assassination attempts failed, does that make you a failure ? 🤔
One succeeded, but you probably don’t want people to feel the same way about you as they felt about the guy who killed Hitler…
I … oh. Hey! Ow.
Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t the agreement with war crimes make you a sympathizer? The act of being a sympathizer is deplorable, but not illegal. I feel like a lot of people take their name-calling to the extremes these days.
Exactly my point but I guess I need to “listen to myself”.
Yeah, you fucking do. You’re like “But is openly agreeing with genocide really a bad thing?” Like that isn’t gross as hell.
Please work.on your reading comprehension. That is not at all what I am asking. What I am asking is if that is already making you a war criminal in contrast to simply a bad person. If you don’t see the difference in that, I cannot help you.
Your question was hair splitting in defense of a genocide supporting piece of shit. You just phrased it as a question.
You need to quit gaslighting people for pointing out the only thing you’re about.
You’re only here to help genocide supporters.
Genocide supporting price of shit, you are saying it yourself! You are not calling her a war criminal either, and that’s the point here but you are not grasping that, so that’s it from my end. Have a good life with your attitude.
I’m saying that at some point, you quit splitting hairs.
Nuance left the building a long time ago.
And nuance left the door wide open for pedantry and contrarianism to come in and set up camp.
If Joe Bloggs next door agrees with war crimes, he’s just an arsehole.
If the head of the United Nations General Assembly agrees with war crimes, I think there’s a case to be made…
Everyone is innocent until proven guilty.
However, persecution is an international crime against humanity, so if someone wanted to, they could make a case against her at the International Crime Court.
If you enable it, maybe, kinda. Something close at least.
It is still considered complicity in violating humanitarian law.