weird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 1 month agoThe duality of mansub.wetshaving.socialimagemessage-square26linkfedilinkarrow-up1591arrow-down110
arrow-up1581arrow-down1imageThe duality of mansub.wetshaving.socialweird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square26linkfedilink
minus-squarejjjalljs@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 month agoHuh. I guess no one says “monosexual”
minus-squaremoody@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 month agoYou don’t need the mono- if there’s only one. It’s just sexual.
minus-squarejjjalljs@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoSometimes you do. Like monologue. Monogamy. Hm but I guess the root isn’t a whole word in those cases.
minus-squarespankinspinach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month ago“No mono” doesn’t have the same ring to it. Unless you’re indicating that you don’t have mono, in which case, it’s… informative?
Huh. I guess no one says “monosexual”
You don’t need the mono- if there’s only one. It’s just sexual.
Sometimes you do. Like monologue. Monogamy. Hm but I guess the root isn’t a whole word in those cases.
“No mono” doesn’t have the same ring to it. Unless you’re indicating that you don’t have mono, in which case, it’s… informative?
mononucleosis.