Sorry, but you are suggesting that the best strategy possible to stop the genocide is to be nice to the person committing the genocide. Can you explain to me how that helps stop the genocide because I’m clearly to dense to grasp it.
Maybe you could point to some recent examples where genocides were stopped by being really nice to the perpetrators.
I’d imagine if one genuinely cares about stopping the genocide they’d be exactly as civil as they’d strategically need to be.
If your excitement in the cancer diagnosis of a old man is more important to you I get why people are weirded out.
The strategically needed civility is zero
Civility is oppression
I wish you luck in the war on manners.
“Manners” are rituals to designed cast out anyone who is “different”
Its disguised ableism
Whilst you are bending over to be polite to people, they are responsible for a genocide. But yes, go you for your brave stance with being civil.
So then shouldn’t we do everything strategically possible to oppose the genocide?
Why is “we should adopt the best strategy possible to stop genocide” so offensive to you?
Sorry, but you are suggesting that the best strategy possible to stop the genocide is to be nice to the person committing the genocide. Can you explain to me how that helps stop the genocide because I’m clearly to dense to grasp it.
Maybe you could point to some recent examples where genocides were stopped by being really nice to the perpetrators.
No, I suggested we adopt the best strategy regardless of what it is.
You said that even if the best strategy possible is to be nice, you wouldn’t consider doing do.
Was being nice to Biden the best strategy do you think? Is being nice to Trump the best strategy?
The best strategy starts with you personally being shoved into a locker for other’s amusement
yea sure