• steeznson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Philosophers tend to avoid that question and argue about extremely niche things like Ship of Theseus problems.

    • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Well the sciences keeps taking all those peksy answerable questions, and religion stole half the remaining ones and is half way across town by now.

      Philosophy is just left holding the bag of all the quibbly things noone is interested in or dont have answers on purpous.

      • steeznson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Philosophy of science was big when I was still studying it. Stuff like whether the Linean System of classifying species were still fit for purpose or the gaps in our knowledge that modern physics leave.

      • steeznson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        My impression of it being like that is largely due to the split between analytic and continental philosophy. Anglophone universities tend to focus on the former and then the latter has a larger body of work from mainland Europe; the many French existentialist philosophers would be a good example.

    • Naz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      24 hours ago

      That’s what makes philosophy interesting.

      I am on my seventh Ship of Thesus, my D: contains /DOSGAMES/ and has a “folder created date” of August 1996.

      As far as I’m concerned, it’s the same ship because I can load up my original SAVEGAMES, they still work, and they can kiss my ass. My ship has gone through the swamp man paradox and emerged the same on the other side. :>