• pdxfed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The language is not typical for an investor suite recognizing the inherent evil in the process, it makes me think it’s for publicity or to drive a legal precedent around the inhumanity required to operate a C corp.

    • Philharmonic3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is the actual language from the suit, but it is used in an accusatory way. Read all the way from page 10-11. Specifically point 37. The suit

      • GorGor@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        So they are trying to force the company to admit, “no we are still committed to anti-consumer policies to boost profits”, is that the point?

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s definitely making some companies billions.

        Not by value gained from the AI, or most of the peoplr actually supplying thr AI stuff. But bubbles are pretty profitable (until they aren’t).