Pages numbered 23 to 26 are the meat of the argument referenced in the image, for anyone else that wants to click through.
“[[l]t can hardly be said that the officer in this case followed the policy [for an inventory search] by conducting a search that included only the glove compartment, and upon finding a gun, leaving it in place.”
Anyone got a link to the motion? Surely it’s a public record, right? This is interesting if true, but I’d like to check the sources.
Sorry if I missed it in the rest of the comments; I scanned them and didn’t see it.
https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/luigi-mangione-dismissal-motion.pdf
Thank you!
Pages numbered 23 to 26 are the meat of the argument referenced in the image, for anyone else that wants to click through.
“[[l]t can hardly be said that the officer in this case followed the policy [for an inventory search] by conducting a search that included only the glove compartment, and upon finding a gun, leaving it in place.”