Lena@gregtech.eu to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 months agoGithub > youtubegregtech.euexternal-linkmessage-square34linkfedilinkarrow-up1642arrow-down10
arrow-up1642arrow-down1external-linkGithub > youtubegregtech.euLena@gregtech.eu to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square34linkfedilink
minus-squareprettybunnys@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoBetter in what way? There are certainly others but … git is the defacto standard for a reason. There are certainly use cases for others, just wondering what you mean?
minus-squarerhabarba@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months ago Git is for bazaar-style development. However, most of my own projects are cathedral-style. Git’s default user experience (CLI command syntax, for example) is weird. There are reasons why Git GUIs are popular and (e.g.) SVN GUIs never were. Git is rather spammy in terms of hard disk usage.
minus-squaregimmemahlulz@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-22 months ago> says there are better back ends > Doesn’t list a single one nor how they’re better
minus-squarerhabarba@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoDepends on the task. SVN or Fossil (if you need a web interface) for cathedral-style, Mercurial for bazaar-style, I’d say. Especially because of their easy to understand UX.
There are better backends though.
Better in what way?
There are certainly others but … git is the defacto standard for a reason.
There are certainly use cases for others, just wondering what you mean?
> says there are better back ends
> Doesn’t list a single one nor how they’re better
Depends on the task. SVN or Fossil (if you need a web interface) for cathedral-style, Mercurial for bazaar-style, I’d say. Especially because of their easy to understand UX.
Removed by mod