• veroxii@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money. Take boots, for example. … A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. … But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that’d still be keeping his feet dry in ten years’ time, while a poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet. This was the Captain Samuel Vimes ‘Boots’ theory of socio-economic unfairness.

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      GNU Sir Terry

      Corporations regularly boast about record profits and the executives get piles of cash and ski vacations but there’s just never enough room in the budget to raise wages for workers. I’m surprised only one CEO has been gunned down so far, the populace has been getting screwed into poverty and it’s not even hidden, so maybe we just take their boots

    • Landless2029@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yep. This tracks.

      My issue now with products is planned obsolescence. Any things aren’t made to last like they used to. They also have extra technology in them making them harder to repair. Appliances, cars and more.