• ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      Them saying Joe Rogan’s podcast is “toxic, diseased, and damaging to society” is not better critique than the other poster calling this comic dog shit. Both are just statements that provide no argument or reasoning behind the statements. Sure they could back it up with examples why it is so, but so could the other commenter, which would make either of those comments valid criticism, but without they are equally good (or bad) criticism.

        • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          Providing 2-3 lines of explanatory context is hardly a research paper, but enough to illustrate reason behind a simple statement.

          AFAIK, the author of this comic is somewhat of an asshat that exercises varying degree of censorship on a comic strip subreddit, based on their personal beliefs.

          • dota__2@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            like i replied to the original comment that person is complaining about, she’s had some really dumb takes but is usually in the right ballpark. those dumb takes were also cases where she doubled down and yeah, that subreddit is basically a safespace for their superusers/content creators.

    • dota__2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      there is no substantive difference between my comment about rogan and that guys comment about this comic. only your opinion is coloring how you take it.

      you and every single person upvoting you are just lemmings wearing a different team’s jersey than the idiot lemming above.

      if anything, we need more haters at this point, because y’all dumb af.