cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/41765246

Well this is interesting. Stick-a-node to any smartphone with magnetic back. I could see myself trying this.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      For your second node, since you’re gonna get a second node, get something with replaceable antenna. There’s a huge difference in signal between the small stock antennae and something like this.

  • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Lol what the hell is that marketing video?

    You’re…walking in the woods…And then suddenly you’re…uh…flashbanged? And then you’re in the back of your kidnapper’s car with a convenient Heltec device to communicate with?

    I honestly have no idea what the actual fuck happened in that marketing video.

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    By chance, do the numbers seem a bit off to anybody else? From what I understand, the battery capacity is 5,000 or 10,000 mAh, but yet it’s only being rated for 3,500 and 6,500 mAh. I heard the bottom 5% is being reserved for the mesh node itself, but that should mean the rating should be for 4,750 and 9,500 mAh.

    • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think they just messed up the units, 6.5Ah * 5V = 32.5Wh which seems reasonable from the 38.7Wh battery, as that’s a total of 84% efficiency which is pretty typical for a power bank.

      So it should say rated capacity = 32.5Wh.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Most battery banks advertise their raw cell Ah/mAh ratings, which of course isn’t the effective Ah at 5V. It seems like Heltec tried listing both ratings here.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well, your phone needs at least 5 volts. So it sounds to me as though if you’re using the node, then it can take advantage of the entire battery. But if you’re using it to charge your phone, you can only take advantage of like 70% of the battery.

          • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.caOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            That’s the standard - listing the raw cell Ah - and it always has been dodgy. I guess in this context ironically it seems more dodgy because they also list the effective capacity. :D

  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    The magnetic wireless charging part seems a bit useless, but the idea to combine a usb powerbank with a LoRa meshtastic device is pretty awesome.

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I don’t plan on using it for wireless charging (although I could) but it makes it easy to carry alongside my phone using the Qi2 magnet pattern.

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Right. Another really interesting idea in my opinion would be to integrate an SX1262 into laptops. That way, if you’re ever off network, you can at least have a low bandwidth communication method.

  • AlchemicalAgent@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I ordered a 5,000 mAh to try out. It saves me from building something similar myself. Prototyping wireless charging is hard enough as it is without taking radio interference into account.

  • Singletona082@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I love it, except for the fact they explicitely state it’s not waterproof. Given the backpacking and otherwise emergancy nature of one of the major selling points of meshtastic? that’s a key feature that needs to be implimented.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Given the connector it’s got, I suspect it might be splashproof or intended to be/become water resistant in a future iteration.

      • AlchemicalAgent@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s what I’m thinking too. Why have a PoGo port if you don’t plan on waterproofing. I already have silicone plugs for USB-C ports.