• catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    Fascinating. But I wouldn’t count watching 1-2-3-1-2-1-3-2-1 as watching 1-2-3, 1-3-2, 2-3-1, 2-1-3, 3-1-2, 3-2-1. It might make sense for some applications, but for watching a series you’d really have to watch each permutation in full.

    • OmegaMouse@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      Why not? It’s the same thing, you just have to change your frame of reference as to which episode was ‘first’ for each permutation

      • apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        I can’t speak for everyone, but datapoint of me:

        I wouldn’t, at all, be able to be in the mental space of “this episode is the third episode in the continuity of 1 2 3, the second episode in the continuity of 2 3 1, and the first episode in a new set”. It isn’t the same thing, practically. Between viewings, you can do a sort of “mental reset” but if theres no “between viewings” and the viewings are in fact simultaneous, I just don’t think its feasible to experience an episode as 3 different points in a chronology at the same time.