‘For those of us with nothing to fear, the truth can’t come soon enough,’ the actor shared on X

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    But “not guilty” is not the same as “innocent,” and dodging legal responsibility is not vindication.

    Basically the courts don’t matter and all that matters is public opinion? And this is where you launch into a “the courts are corrupt” and “the rich never get punished” or some similar BS?

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      The courts do matter, for legal decisions. They don’t have the final say beyond that. Sure, you can use them as a data point, but the requirement for finding someone guilty for a criminal charge is “beyond a reasonable doubt” (aka, there’s only a slim chance it isn’t true).

      Socially, that isn’t required. Usually we only care if it’s more likely than not. Sometimes, depending on the severity of the accusation, a lot of people have an even lower barrier for taking it into account to effect their opinion of the person. For example, if there’s some evidence that someone is a murderer, but not “beyond a reasonable doubt,” I’m probably not going to hang out with them, especially alone.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      When it comes to matters of judgement, I use my own. The courts don’t have to be corrupt for them to fail sexual assault victims, but yes there is plenty of corruption, too.

      Are you suggesting economics don’t affect putcomes in the courts? Are you suggesting that there is no corruption within the judicial system? Are you saying that sexual predators always go to jail for their crimes?

    • knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Legal doesn’t always mean morally right. He’s a free man, but that doesn’t mean he still needs to take up one of the rare vip spots, I’m sure there are unheard voices and talented actors who deserve it more.

    • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I find this especially hilarious considering his cases were on around the same time as Cosby’s and Weinstein’s.

      It seems people honestly believe that Kevin Spacey has more pull/better lawyers than Harvey fucking Weinstein…

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Different circumstances and different crimes, and especially different victims.

        Also, Weinstein and Cosby were openly assaulting women for decades. They victimized hundreds of women, and Cosby isn’t even in jail anymore.

    • sloppysol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      What matters is what’s true, and the courts ARE getting more compromised every day. The rich get punished less, that’s the way it’s always worked.

      I guess this is where you took the most extreme possible opposing view and argued against that.